Please include your email address with membership registration to receive the Remigration Action member’s campaign pack.

The purpose of the Nationality and Remigration Act proposal is to facilitate a reversal of mass immigration and the consequent harm done to the indigenous population opposed to it. To achieve this status in law, we have to leave the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and all subsequent amendments at the ‘United’ Nations’. Leaving the Council of Europe or ECHR is vitally important to ensure legally nothing can be done in the biased courts by activist judges to halt remigration. All liberal-left activist judges will be replaced.

The Agenda

A plethora of toxic legislation has been passed through the UK Parliament by the Globalists to ensure mass immigration and illegal migration can continue contrary to the will of the majority. At the EUref on 23 June 2016, some 17.4 million Britons voted to take control over our borders and halt the immigration invasion. The will of the majority was ignored with a raft of anti-democratic measures designed to subvert the public mandate.

Mass immigration is now an existential threat for the British people and their will has been subverted by treacherous Globalists in Parliament. As a result, we propose to enforce the public mandate using new legislation but first a nexus of interconnecting acts of ‘law’ have to be repealed, starting with The Race Relations Act and The Equalities Act, both of which aid and abet ‘legal’ and illegal immigration. We regard ‘legal’ immigration, notoriously described as the ‘Blair wave’ and ‘Boris wave’ as the fundamental threat to our national security. But illegal migration must be stopped first to secure our borders for public safety.

Emergency Proposals

The nationality and remigration policy can only succeed where a credible set of proposals has been worked out to ensure its success and it has to be underpinned by new legislation.

  1. Britain will withdraw from the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and the Council of Europe othewise known as the ‘ECHR’. We will stop all immigration for a minmum of 10 years, a vital moratorium to secure our borders.
  2. The Race Relations Act and The Equalities Act will be repealed entirely without amendment and replaced later by The Nationality Act.
  3. Legal Aid funding to ‘immigration lawyers’ and for all immigration cases in the courts will be stopped. Private funding donated to lawyers from overseas will be seized. By withdrawing from the ECHR and the UN Refugee Convention, lawyers will have no grounds to appeal any deportation ordered by the Home Office.
  4. All immigration legislation will be repealed or amended according to the exigencies of national security and for public protection.
  5. Organisations like Care4Calais will be regarded as people traffickers and a threat to national security and their activists will be detained under counter terrorism legislation.
  6. All demonstrations in favour of legal and/or illegal immigration will be proscribed by the Home Secretary as a threat to national security and to ensure the remigration process can be undertaken with the minimum interference by dangerous left-wing radicals. Where necessary for public protection, Leftist groups will be proscribed by the Home Secretary using executive authority.
  7. The objective of nationality and remigration is to achieve a 95% indigenous supermajority or at the very least it should be 90%.  We set out the key proposals as follows for the people we regard deemed suitable for remigration and our plan to make it happen.
  8. In the first wave, with all the foreging emergency proposals in force, we will set about stopping all illegal immigration to resolve the crisis in the English Channel. We will deploy military forces where needed to stop illegal boat crossings until deterence is achieved. All social benefits to illegal migrants will be stopped immediately and those already on British soil will be remigrated to their country of origin without appeal to any court. To ensure the success of the operation we will negotiate a returns policy with the nations involved.
  9. After tackling the illegal immigration crisis, we will remigrate all foreign criminals and all Islamists on the terror watch list and their families and support network. ‘Foreign criminals’ also relates to everyone involved in the grooming gangs conspiracy and we propose to seize their assets using POCO legislation to finance their remigration.
  10. A raft of foreign subversives have taken root in Britain, routinely appearing on television shows to denounce or attack white people and Britain in general and we regard all of these foreigners as tier one candidates for remigration. Our objective will be to remigrate all of them to nations where they do not feel so uncomfortable around white people and European culture.
  11. Our next objective will be to remigrate the ‘Blair wave’ and the ‘Boris wave’ who entered Britain during the Globalist onslaught against the nation state. In real terms, all foreigners who entered this country from 1997 onwards will be deemed remigration candidates and our objective will be to remove them from the country in phased operations.
  12. In the final phase of remigration, we will go through all existing immigration records dating back to the arrival of the Empire Windrush in 1948. From this list, we will determine who will be allowed to stay in the country. Over 70s of retirement age will be exempted automatically as will mixed-race people with one British parent. Our objective is to achieve a 95% white supermajority within 20 years or at the very least a 90% white supermajority.
  13. The entire anti-British race relations industry and all diversity hires will be put out of business permanently. A notorious example being the creation of a Windrush Commissioner by the anti-British Labour regime.
  14. Once immigration has been brought under control and remigration is proceeding at a successful pace, we will introduce the Variable Residency Rules policy for all European nations and this will be open for those of European heritage only. Our genetic cousins in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa will be given a fast-track status to settling in the UK.
  15. We will make it illegal to campaign for British sovereignty to be surrendered to a foreign power like the EU, thus ensuring the permanent existence of the nation state and our triumph over Globalism.
  16. The Nationality and Remigration Act will be amended to The Nationality Act once remigration has been completed and this legislation will bind all future parliaments in constitutional law.

30 responses to “The Nationality and Remigration Act”

  1. John Elsworth avatar
    John Elsworth

    Should it instead say: Immigration is now an existential threat

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      It’s always been existential by design.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. freelyimportant8b49945f93 avatar
    freelyimportant8b49945f93

    Second paragraph after the heading “Agenda” reads: “Remigration is now an existential threat”

    I am sure you meant to say: “Immigration is now an existential threat “.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      Resolved, amended.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. freelyimportant8b49945f93 avatar
    freelyimportant8b49945f93

    Sorry, but you missed my point that the there is a typo Immigration not Reimmigration

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      No such typo exists and it’s remigration not ‘reimmigration’.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. freelyimportant8b49945f93 avatar
        freelyimportant8b49945f93

        So I don’t get the job as proofreader then?

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Daily Agenda avatar

    LOL, sorry mate, I corrected the typo before you mentioned it but I sent the draft to two people before publishing and they didn’t notice it either. So, pro bono, you do get the job of proofing.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. David Jessop avatar
    David Jessop

    Re: Section 12, the final phase.

    Perhaps the financial contribution metric could be deployed here? Those who contribute least to GDP go first?

    Also do you have any thoughts on a proportional demographic breakdown of the 5% of foreigners who will remain under this scheme, or will it simply be done under a first in -last out basis?

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      Good point David. The 5% or 10% would be those with mixed race children with at least one British parent. Notable others will be exempt, over 70s for example.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. ??? avatar
    ???

    Proposals 9,10,11,12 – numbers envisaged in each case?

    What do you propose to do about the low ethnic British birth rate?

    Your videos are great entertainment by the way. Some would say they’re grossly divisive.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      9, 10, 11 and 12, we don’t have access the exact numbers because the Government is a swamp of deceit but our objective is 95% white supermajority. We propose to increase the indigenous birth rates using education and Government grants. I dare say my videos are very divisive and that’s the way I like, sorts the wheat from the chaff.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. ??? avatar
        ???

        I would suspect that without a sustained attack on feminism, you will fail to effectively increase the ethnic British birth rate. This issue is central to any national re-birth. The current low birth rate is used as the central argument for mass immigration by liberals. Feminism is not just a pillar of Cultural Marxism, it is the central pillar.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Daily Agenda avatar

        Yes that is a principle problem but the real mission is stop immigration and start mass remigration.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. ??? avatar
    ???

    It’s amazing how many supposedly “nationalist” groups in Europe have women at the highest level. Some of them even use feminist rhetoric from time to time,

    Achieving a 95% ethnic British majority is worthless if all it does is perpetuate the same old liberal culture.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      Europe not Britain, big difference.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. ??? avatar
    ???

    I think you’ll struggle to get majority parliamentary support for clauses 11 and 12. These people mostly came in legally and many have off spring born in The UK. Do you really imagine getting 50% + 1 of the electorate in support of these policies, given how many of the electorate are now either ethnic or mixed heritage? You would require a super majority of the ethnic British to vote in favor. You would require a complete collapse of the UK economy to enter this territory.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      Of course, there will always be obstacles but I agree with Professor David Betz.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. ??? avatar
        ???

        Having these clauses in your program is not cost free. Many of those who agree with the rest of your approach will be alienated by these policies.

        Perhaps clauses 11 and 12 could be voluntary or even subsidized in some manner?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Daily Agenda avatar

        I don’t think they will be alienated, just because you are. Why do you have a problem with a white supermajority?

        Liked by 1 person

  9. ??? avatar
    ???

    You really think that the current democratic process will produce a majority for involuntary expulsions on a massive scale (short of the country collapsing). Good luck with that.

    I have no problem with a 100% ethnic British population, but I suspect it’s now beyond realisation. The damage appears to have been done.

    Your other policies are possibly achievable and should be linked with an escalation in the ethnic British birth rate using appropriate methods. Maybe that approach will get you to 90%. in the long term.

    Like

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      We do believe it and why do you keep posting on here anonymously?

      Like

      1. ??? avatar
        ???

        I’m a coward.

        By the way, I have no political allegiance or axe to grind, I just found your YouTube videos interesting. You have a great way of presenting yourself whatever people think about your views.

        Liked by 1 person

  10. John avatar
    John

    “All demonstrations in favour of legal and/or illegal immigration will be proscribed by the Home Secretary as a threat to national security and to ensure the remigration process can be undertaken with the minimum interference by dangerous left-wing radicals. Where necessary for public protection, Leftist groups will be proscribed by the Home Secretary using executive authority”.

    So much for free speech. I guess you can’t handle diversity of opinion.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      This is not a free speech matter, it’s a national security issue.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Joe avatar
      Joe

      When freedom of speech starts to threaten the very existence of our people, land and culture, it becomes treason. I could stand outside your house protesting for violent ex criminals to live with you and your family as they need a place to stay upon release, I’m sure in that instance you would want to stop my ‘freedom of speech’ for fears of the saftey of you and your family. Reality isn’t too far from that example, left wing radicals protesting for violent young men to be let into our home by the boat load.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. saladslowly3992880661 avatar
    saladslowly3992880661

    We must get organised and prepare for the initial onslaught.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Daily Agenda avatar

      Indeed.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. Joe avatar
    Joe

    I’ve never seen a set of paragraphs so beautiful. I’m not in a position to join as a member right now but I will, at least for now I’ll be spreading the word. Remigration Action for a white super majority, it’s got a ring to it.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Russell White avatar
    Russell White

    The Emergency Proposals are good. Between 90-95% white is achievable. The definition of “white” is tricky though, as it could mean the indigenous still being a minority. Full nationality ought to mean 5 great-grandparents being born in either Britain or Ireland (to cover the constitutional changes of the 20th Century). Any future immigration policy would prioritise these over other white people.

    With regard to who would leave first it needs to be done on this basis:

    1. Any illegals.
    2. Anyone who is currently serving time in prison.
    3. Anyone who is long-term unemployed.
    4. Anyone who cannot speak basic English.
    5. Those in the immigration industry who fit the criteria.

    Just my views, there is nothing wrong with the proposal as it stands.

    Like

Leave a reply to Daily Agenda Cancel reply

Quote of the week

“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.”

~ W. Clement Stone